i went for the kh today for personal reasons.
it was pretty dumb, but not horrible.
anyway the speaker used a terrible, but accurate illustration in his gb approved outline.
DoC;
Maybe it's because we're now 101 years on passed 1914 with the big A nowhere in sight. Now entering the 2016 service year, it will be 102 years on. It sounds too like you mentioned because people are starting to question things. That's why all these broadcasts about obedience and WT's about loyalty etc........
so i was eagerly (add sarcasm) awaiting the co visit this week.
for once because is less work being at the meeting.
i just have to sit down and listen.
stuckinarut2;
''we may receive instructions that may seem strange, but we must be willing to obey whether they seem strategic from a human standpoint or not''
so, you never know. That is (was) one of the most chilling statements, makes one wonder, what the heck have they got up their sleeves!!
so i was eagerly (add sarcasm) awaiting the co visit this week.
for once because is less work being at the meeting.
i just have to sit down and listen.
i went for the kh today for personal reasons.
it was pretty dumb, but not horrible.
anyway the speaker used a terrible, but accurate illustration in his gb approved outline.
i went for the kh today for personal reasons.
it was pretty dumb, but not horrible.
anyway the speaker used a terrible, but accurate illustration in his gb approved outline.
saturday, september 19th, 2015: .
earlier today snugglebunny posted a pic of today's "daily text" which is based on a paragraph from the november 15th, 2013 article.
that magazine contains the now infamous maxim: .
oubliette;
Yes!!! It does seem oddly convenient that they would study that WT in January of 2014 about ''receiving instructions that may not seem strategic from a human standpoint''. That study just being almost 4 months exactly prior to implementing this new ''stealth tithing'' mechanism. Wow!!! hmm, interesting isn't it??
saturday, september 19th, 2015: .
earlier today snugglebunny posted a pic of today's "daily text" which is based on a paragraph from the november 15th, 2013 article.
that magazine contains the now infamous maxim: .
first a clarification - this is not about policies on faders etc.
it is about how the borg allow policies and doctrines to fade rather than correct them and apologise for mistakes.
here are two examples of what i mean:.
i started working on this chart 5 years ago.
i didn't think i'd have to update it again so soon.. .
linky in case image doesn't show below.
